Data Centre Watch Updated 23 October 2026, 17:16 UTC
Data Centre Watch
The local fight over one field is one row in a national rush. This is a rolling, fully sourced record of what changed — the schemes, the planning decisions, the power and water, and the wider world picture.
days under a hosepipe ban
Under a hosepipe ban for 106 days — since 10 July 2026 (as of 23 October 2026).
Affinity Water — Central region (incl. WD5), extended to the East region
11 areas in drought, parts of 4 in severe · reservoirs 54% · the water picture →
Latest
8 entries matching · showing 1–8
-
A £12m data centre under a Burnley hotel — with almost no detail
Plans would convert the upper and lower underground car parks and basement of The Brunlea Hotel on Keirby Walk, Burnley, into a £12m, 4,000 sq m data centre. The application is filed as a bare 'change of use': no transport, parking, air-quality, energy, carbon, drainage or noise assessments, and it is unclear who the operator would be or how much power it would draw. It is linked to the Burnley-based Real Big Group; a council cabinet member has formally objected, and the application will be decided later.
Why it matters: A reminder of how little a planning application can contain for one of the most energy- and water-intensive forms of development.
Source: BBC News / Local Democracy Reporting [C]
-
1GW data centre and 1.3GW solar proposed for West Norfolk
EPL Norfolk Ltd has unveiled 'Longmarsh Green Energy': up to 1.3GW of solar and battery storage paired with a 1GW data-centre campus across two West Norfolk sites, near Tilney St Lawrence and Fincham/Barton Bendish, connecting to the Walpole substation from 2031. The combined solar sites cover about 4,695 acres (1,900ha). Its scale makes it a nationally significant infrastructure project, so the decision rests with the government rather than the council; consultation runs to 26 November, an application is due by April 2027, a decision by July 2028 and operation by 2032. The company claims around £25bn of investment, thousands of construction jobs and more than 500 operational roles; the borough council leader questions the site's proximity to RAF Marham (solar dazzle) and nearby nature sites.
Why it matters: The 'solar farm + data centre' model arriving in the Fens — powering the compute with what's grown on the land.
Source: Lynn News / BBC [C]
Changes (2)
- — Added the NSIP route and timeline (app April 2027, decision July 2028, live 2032), the 4,695-acre solar footprint, ~500 operational roles and the council leader's RAF Marham/nature concerns.
- — First filed.
-
North Devon revolt over a 1.5GW campus in a UNESCO biosphere
Xlinks has secured ~850 acres for a 1.5GW AI campus plus a 1.8GW battery in the North Devon biosphere — five buildings up to 40m high and ~96 acres of lithium-ion batteries. The North Devon Data Centre campaign has now launched, backing a national petition for a moratorium on data centres outside designated growth zones. FOI documents obtained by CPRE Devon show Xlinks has applied for AI Growth Zone designation — for up to 5GW of data centres — and that Torridge District Council is being pressed to write the Torrington site into its emerging Local Plan.
Why it matters: The datacentre revolt arriving in a protected landscape — the same fight, a different field.
Source: The Guardian [V]
Changes (2)
- — Added the AI Growth Zone bid (up to 5GW) revealed by FOI, and the Local Plan allocation being weighed by Torridge.
- — First filed.
-
Drax's AI Growth Zone bid rejected — but the 100MW scheme continues
The government dropped the Drax / University of York bid for an AI Growth Zone, removing a route to national support. Drax says its separate first-phase ~100MW data centre is still being prepared for submission. New analysis estimates the plant would emit more CO₂ a year than all flights from Gatwick Airport.
Why it matters: Losing a Growth Zone bid isn't a planning refusal — but it strips a signal investors watch.
Source: Planning Geek / Land & Climate Review [C]
Changes (2)
- — Added the emissions finding: the planned data centre would emit more CO₂ a year than all flights from Gatwick.
- — First filed.
-
Lanarkshire AI growth zone questioned over land and jobs
Residents near Newarthill and Airdrie are questioning the promised benefits of the CoreWeave/DataVita zone: 1GW needs ~44 km² of nearby land by conservative estimates, but current holdings appear to be under a tenth of that, and Action to Protect Rural Scotland says the 3,400-job figure could be 'a hundred times' too high.
Why it matters: The gap between headline jobs/land claims and what is actually secured — the campaign's recurring question.
Source: DailySynapse [C]
-
Fawley Waterside: a 1.5M sq ft campus with data centres on a former power station
On the former Fawley Power Station site near Southampton, Fawley Waterside is proposing a 1.5M sq ft industrial and commercial campus combining energy, digital, maritime and commercial uses — with data centres and advanced computing among the potential digital occupants.
Why it matters: Another retired power station pitched as a home for compute — the land-and-grid logic, again.
Source: Bisnow [C]
-
Data centre vies with 8,000 homes at Charlton Riverside
Greenwich Council opposes a 180MW data-centre campus on the former Stone Foundries site — land zoned for housing — before an application is even submitted. Promoted by GLI (Patrizia + Kingston Space); the government says data centres use just 0.2% of England's non-household water, while Water UK says it needs authorisation to invest ahead of demand.
Why it matters: The same land can't be both homes and data halls — and the water arithmetic is being fought over in public.
Source: BBC News [V]
-
60-hectare Cheshire campus sparks local concern
Innova's 'Spodegreen' campus near Little Bollington (on Tatton Estate land) has not yet been submitted, but residents are worried about homes, businesses and wildlife — and the National Trust is reviewing it near Dunham Massey.
Why it matters: The pattern reaching the countryside: farmland, a stately estate, and a pre-application charm offensive.
Source: BBC News [C]
Watchlist — what lands next
| What | State | When |
|---|---|---|
| Data-centre National Policy Statement (NPS) | Still unpublished; projects already being directed into the NSIP regime without it. | Expected 'shortly after' the Jan 2026 regulations |
| Ofgem 'Curate' data-centre connection reform | Consultation closed 17 Sep 2026; decision pending — commitment fee £237,500–£712,500/MW. | Decision later in 2026 |
| Scotland — hyperscale planning guidance | Parliament agreed no decisions on hyperscale applications until guidance is published. | Guidance expected by December 2026 |
| Draft London Plan — data-centre policy GLE3 | Consultation closed 15 October 2026; responses under consideration. | Next draft / adoption pending |
| National Scheme of Delegation for planning functions (SI 2026/854) | Standardises which applications go to officers vs committee; non-compliant committee decisions open to judicial review. | In force 31 October 2026 |
| EU data-centre standards and rating scheme | Commission has adopted a data-centre sustainability rating scheme; consultation on minimum performance standards remains open. | Consultation closes 14 December 2026 |
| Environmental Audit Committee report (HC 22) | Inquiry 'Risks and opportunities to the sustainability of data centres in the UK'; report + government response due. | Awaiting publication |
| Three Rivers Local Plan examination | Plan submitted; examination in H1 2027, adoption targeted Sep 2027. | Submission 30 November 2026 |
Join our WhatsApp group
Get the latest on the consultation, the examination and what happens next — straight from the campaign.
Subscribe by RSS/Atom
Follow the campaign in any feed reader (Feedly, NetNewsWire, Thunderbird, Inoreader…) — no account, no emails, no tracking.
Right-click → copy the link and paste it into your reader, or click if your browser opens feeds directly.
Fully sourced, no invented numbers
Every entry names its source and how it is known — verified, a designated claim, our calculation, or a gap. Where a claim is contested, we say so. See all reports & explainers →