Data Centre Watch Updated 23 October 2026, 17:16 UTC

Data Centre Watch

Illustration: a matte, monolith-like data slab standing alone in a wildflower meadow, black cables fanning from its base into the soil like roots, a lone oak and a low sun behind.

The local fight over one field is one row in a national rush. This is a rolling, fully sourced record of what changed — the schemes, the planning decisions, the power and water, and the wider world picture.

106

days under a hosepipe ban

Under a hosepipe ban for 106 days — since 10 July 2026 (as of 23 October 2026).

Affinity Water — Central region (incl. WD5), extended to the East region

11 areas in drought, parts of 4 in severe · reservoirs 54% · the water picture →

Source: Affinity Water — Temporary Use Ban

Latest

5 entries matching · showing 1–5

  1. Updated 13 Oct UK Wokingham, Berkshire 72 MW Submitted

    Thames Valley Park 72MW submitted — gas-backed

    Now formally submitted (applicant FH Trustees, acting for Mapeley's Beta HL unit trust, Jersey-registered), the 72MW scheme replaces three former Microsoft buildings near Reading and relies on natural-gas fuel cells as a bridge: only 1.8MW of grid power is available at first, the larger connection is backstopped to 2037, and even then only ~60MW of the site's ~110MW peak is secured. Microsoft vacates the offices by Dec 2027; comments close 29 Oct (ref 262274). The technical plan also proposes exporting waste heat to a future district heating network serving the Royal Berkshire Hospital, the University of Reading and local schools; a decision is expected by March 2027.

    Why it matters: 'Green' data centres running on fossil gas for years, because the grid can't deliver in time.

    Source: Planning Geek [V]

    Changes (3)
    1. — Added the waste-heat-to-district-heating plan (Royal Berkshire Hospital, University of Reading, schools) and the expected March 2027 decision.
    2. — Confirmed formal submission (FH Trustees for Mapeley's Beta HL unit trust); wired in the fuel-cell bridge and the 2037 grid backstop.
    3. — First filed.
  2. Updated 13 Oct UK Kidlington, Oxfordshire Submitted

    Exeter College's £900m 'EXOq' campus heads to a decision

    A £900m data centre and innovation campus beside Oxford Parkway, funded by Exeter College, goes to Cherwell District Council in early November — pitched for AI and quantum research on the Oxford–Cambridge growth corridor. The decision awaits the council's independent golf-need report, the third such survey attached to the application.

    Why it matters: Universities and colleges are becoming data-centre backers, on the government's 'Europe's Silicon Valley' corridor.

    Source: Cherwell [C]

    Changes (2)
    1. — Decision now expected in early November, after the council's independent golf-need report.
    2. — First filed.
  3. UK Buckinghamshire 100 MW Submitted

    ACRE's Pinewood scheme to run on gas for a decade-plus

    A ~£570m data centre at Pinewood Nurseries would lean on on-site gas engines while it anticipates a minimum 10-year wait for a firm grid connection. Stoke Poges Parish Council objected over air quality, carbon and noise.

    Why it matters: Gas becomes the default when grid capacity can't arrive on the project's timeline.

    Source: Briefs [V]

  4. UK Dumfries & Galloway, Scotland 1000 MW Submitted

    £16.5bn / 1GW Chapelcross campus lodged

    CX Tech's application for eight data centres on the former Chapelcross nuclear site (application 26/1649/PIP) claims up to 1GW and 162,000 m². APRS says it would be larger than any operating data centre; the Scottish Greens call it 'reckless'.

    Why it matters: The biggest proposed array in the UK, pitched as brownfield renewal — and disputed as farmland.

    Source: BBC / STV News [V]

  5. UK Slough, Berkshire 216 MW Submitted

    Three more data centres planned on Slough green belt

    Manor Farm Propco wants three data centres (216MW, 141 backup generators) on 23.5 ha of green belt beside the scheme the government approved on appeal. Comment closes 20 Oct; a resident petition has passed 776 signatures.

    Why it matters: Green belt reclassified as 'grey belt' — the loophole that lets farmland become data halls.

    Source: Slough Borough Council / Slough Daily [V]

Watchlist — what lands next

WhatStateWhen
Data-centre National Policy Statement (NPS) Still unpublished; projects already being directed into the NSIP regime without it. Expected 'shortly after' the Jan 2026 regulations
Ofgem 'Curate' data-centre connection reform Consultation closed 17 Sep 2026; decision pending — commitment fee £237,500–£712,500/MW. Decision later in 2026
Scotland — hyperscale planning guidance Parliament agreed no decisions on hyperscale applications until guidance is published. Guidance expected by December 2026
Draft London Plan — data-centre policy GLE3 Consultation closed 15 October 2026; responses under consideration. Next draft / adoption pending
National Scheme of Delegation for planning functions (SI 2026/854) Standardises which applications go to officers vs committee; non-compliant committee decisions open to judicial review. In force 31 October 2026
EU data-centre standards and rating scheme Commission has adopted a data-centre sustainability rating scheme; consultation on minimum performance standards remains open. Consultation closes 14 December 2026
Environmental Audit Committee report (HC 22) Inquiry 'Risks and opportunities to the sustainability of data centres in the UK'; report + government response due. Awaiting publication
Three Rivers Local Plan examination Plan submitted; examination in H1 2027, adoption targeted Sep 2027. Submission 30 November 2026

Join our WhatsApp group

Get the latest on the consultation, the examination and what happens next — straight from the campaign.

Subscribe by RSS/Atom

Follow the campaign in any feed reader (Feedly, NetNewsWire, Thunderbird, Inoreader…) — no account, no emails, no tracking.

Right-click → copy the link and paste it into your reader, or click if your browser opens feeds directly.

Fully sourced, no invented numbers

Every entry names its source and how it is known — verified, a designated claim, our calculation, or a gap. Where a claim is contested, we say so. See all reports & explainers →